range

[bronze_ribbons]

Says You is a public radio program that includes bluffing rounds, where one team is assigned an obscure word, two of its members create fake definitions for it, and the other team tries to guess the actual definition. Yesterday, the word for one of the rounds was filk.

I thought, "Oh, geez, that's a gimme!"

The guessing panel picked one of the fake definitions.

The studio audience was in favor of the other fake definition.

In tandem with my partner discovering Dr. Horrible's Singalong Blog only just last week, it's a well-timed reminder that my perceptions of "popular" and "well-known" are somewhat skewed.

(This is related to why I generally discourage academic authors from using the adjective "well-known" and "famous" in their prose: if something is truly is well-known, saying so is redundant, and if it's knowledge that wasn't previously shared by the reader, it can unnecessarily distance or alienate them.)

(Tangent: the only other word I've recognized going into a bluffing round was "hardanger." That one, not so much of a double-take.)

---

I haven't gotten around to reading Alma Alexander's books yet, but I peeked at her Flycon posts from this past weekend, and this one really struck a chord with me:

...whoever said that you or ANYBODY else are going to be reading the same book, ever, even when every word in it is identical between your two copies?

...It is flat impossible to write for every possible interpretation of a given set of words – you would have to have the mind and the breadth of vision of a God to be able to understand everything about everybody, to know the contents of every single person's duffle bag as they slog along the road of life. You write a story -- and after it's out of your hands it's between the story and the readers. They may have issues with the story. While "issues" are often something that you can take on board and fix in your head and do better (or try to) in your next story -- it's also true that you could not posssibly have known about every issue from every reader. You owe the reader the best story that you could write. What they discover in it… is more often than not something that you never thought that you had said. As a writer, this is something that you have to live with.

Comments

[kabal42.insanejournal.com]

Ooooh! There used to be a radio show just like that in Denmark when I was little. It had around 5 episodes each year, right around Christmas. Three people - all sounded warm and nice, like family you like - would each present a definition on a strange word and the listeners could call in. If they got through (only one caller per word) they got to guess and if they were right they one a basket with wine and chocolate :-)
My family always made a game of it, guessing along and running around the house looking stuff up in old dictionaries and encyclopaedia. They'd usually use old Danish words, you see. It was so much fun! Wouldn't work as well today as we'd all just google it... But such a nice memory :-)

[bronze_ribbons.insanejournal.com]

That sounds like such a lovely memory -- thank you for sharing it!

[aunty_marion.insanejournal.com]

The UK version on TV was called 'Call My Bluff' - similar format, two teams of three.

One of my filk friends posted about this a few days ago, too (the show must be shown at different times in different places - she heard it on NPR in Arkansas on the 14th), and pointed out that even the 'correct' definition given on the show was not entirely accurate. Apparently the "official" definition card cited it as music in SF films as well as at SF conventions.

But still, as she said, "W00T!"

[bronze_ribbons.insanejournal.com]

Yeah, NPR stations have very different schedules; I only catch "Says You" when I drive to Cookeville, since I'm usually at the 9 a.m. service at my home church other Sundays.

And yes, the index card definition sounded off to me as well, but dictionaries can be weird like that -- I looked up "geek" a couple years ago for a sermon, and the primary definition was someone who bites the heads off chickens. A wee bit out of date, that...

[dichroic.livejournal.com (from insanejournal.com)]

Alma blogs on LJ as anghara, in case you care. She is very often well worth reading because she takes more joy in little beauties than anyone else I've ever met. I confess I haven't read the Jin-Shei books yet but I like the Worldweaver series a lot, despite a feeling that the editor should have been more ruthless. (Not about length, about logical loose ends and how computers work.)

Disclaimer: she's a good friend of my brother's and I have met her three times, now, in three cities on two continents.